In an unprecedented stir, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has charged OMICS Group, Inc. for deceiving researchers and academicians about publication fees, peer review process, and the nature of its publications.
On its official website, OMICS claims that it operates more than 700 “peer reviewed, open access journals” and has “50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations” in various fields. However, the complaint registered by FTC states that these claims are false, and most of the papers published by the OMICS journals do not go after a peer review process. Further, it accuses OMICS of listing editors without seeking their consent and announcing a high influence factor without any suitable evidence. The most concerning part of the charge is that OMICS does not expose its publication charges until after accepting an article for publication. Moreover, it does not permit researchers to withdraw their manuscript. Therefore, those who have submitted their paper either have to pay to get their paper published or risk their paper being held hostage.
Incidentally, Jeffrey Beall, a librarian renowned for maintaining a list of publishers with questionable practices, had listed the OMICS Group as one of the probable predatory publishers. Taking a stance against questionable publishing, Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection said, “It is vital that we stop scammers who seek to take advantage of the switching landscape of academic publishing.” If FTC succeeds in winning the suit, the court might order OMICS to come back money to the affected researchers. While the exact amount has not been specified, this would be a big step in bringing predatory publishers to justice.
U.S. government agency sues publisher, charging it with deceiving researchers
Saving oneself from the clutches of a predatory journal: A case investigate
Elementary steps authors can go after to protect their research from predatory publishers
Interview with Jeffrey Beall